Contents:
Apostle Beloved disciple Evangelist Patmos Presbyter. Apocryphon Acts Signs Gospel.
Authorship of the Johannine works. Prologue to John , Book of Signs , and John Historicity of the Bible.
Barrett quotes on that sense Robinson, who in asserted "the gospel is composed in Judea and under the pressure of controversy with "the jews" [ sic ] of that area. But in its present form it is an appeal to those outside the Church, to win to the faith that Greek speaking Diaspora Judaism to which the author now finds himself belonging". He also notes that the sole exception occurs in the prologue, serving a narrative purpose, whereas the later aphorisms serve a "paraenetic function".
It holds that the eschatological passages in the New Testament do not refer to future events, but instead to the ministry of Jesus and his lasting legacy. The Gospel and Epistles of John: The Epistles of John.
Introduction to the New Testament. Howard Marshall and J. Robinson in seeing the evidence as pointing to John the son of Zebedee as the author of this Gospel. Many recent writers have shown that there is good reason for regarding this or that story in John as authentic.
It is difficult to The fact is John is concerned with historical information. John apparently records this kind of information because he believes it to be accurate. He has some reliable information and has recorded it carefully. The evidence is that where he can be tested John proves to be remarkably accurate.
John knew the other gospels and The synoptic narrative becomes more intelligible if we follow John. He does not yield to any temptation to restate Christianity.
It is the story of events that happened in history. John does not divorce the story from its Palestinian context. It follows that it is important for the evangelist that what he narrates happened. MacMillan and Co, John gives us the more perfect portrait". John" , p 9. One reason he accepts John's authorship is because "the alternative solutions seem far too complicated to be possible in a world where living men met and talked". II, p Robinson, J. Marsh, "John seems to have believed that theology was not something which could be used to read a meaning into events but rather something that was to be discovered in them.
Jonathan Bourgel, " John 4: The Maverick Gospel" Louisville: Westminster John Knox , , pp. Studies in the Spirituality of Jesuits. The Bible Knowledge Commentary. The Pillar New Testament Commentary: The Gospel According to John. Westminster John Knox Press. The Gospel According to St. The Testimony of the Beloved Disciple: Narrative, History, and Theology in the Gospel of John.
Major Themes in Johannine Theology. The Historical Reliability of John's Gospel. Journal of Theological Studies. The Gospel According to John, Volume 1. An Introduction to the New Testament. In Evans, Craig A. The Routledge Encyclopedia of the Historical Jesus. An introduction to the New Testament and the origins of Christianity. Chilton, Bruce; Neusner, Jacob Judaism in the New Testament: The Gospel and Letters of John. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church.
John and the Synoptics. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium. The Parting of the Ways — A. The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture. From Jesus to Christ: Understanding the Bible 7th ed. In Coogan, Michael D. The New Oxford Annotated Bible 3rd ed.
Date of John's Gospel We recently re-posted Russell Grigg's classic article John the Creation Evangelist, which is still as relevant now as it was when it was first. The Gospel of John is the fourth of the canonical gospels. The work is anonymous, although it scholars agree that it was written by a separate author, John of Patmos, c. 95 with some parts possibly dating to Nero's reign in the early 60s.
Historical Questions about Earliest Devotion to Jesus. A Theology of John's Gospel and Letters: The Word, the Christ, the Son of God. Jesus' Death as Cosmic Battle in John Journal of Biblical Literature. Charting the Fourth Gospel. AD offer significant sections of John. The Egyptian witness, Papyrus Egerton 2, supplies a composite work from c. The above evidence suggests copies of the gospel circulating around Egypt in the first and second halves of the second century.
This suggests a date for John to be at least around the turn of the century. Therefore, if John is the author of the Gospel, then a date between seems to be possible. The present tense in John 5: This is a strong argument. The correct tradition of Palestinian places, situations, and customs argues for a time before or shortly after AD 70 when the scenes could be remembered as they were but the author could tap his own memory without tying his writing to that period. This would argue for a later date rather than an earlier one.
It is possible that the Gospel was written just before or just after AD 70 6. It is also possible that the Gospel was written in the latter part of the first century--around the turn of the century AD which allows for the writing of the three epistles and Revelation by John external evidence. There is no explicit evidence for the place of origin or for the destination of the Gospel of John. Chapter 21 need not be considered a portion later added to the original conclusion of the Gospel.
The two pronged purpose statement for the book relates to the two pronged thrust of the book Unlike the synoptics which reveal Jesus inductively from the ground up , John reveals Jesus deductively from heaven down. There are similarities between John and the synoptics e.
John is less narrative and more discourse oriented. John is philosophical and Rabbinic. There are differences of historical and chronological items such as the dating of the cleansing of the temple, the duration of the ministry of Jesus, and the dating of the Last Supper. It was a substitute for the synoptics Egypt is a long way from Ephesus, thus it would have taken time for the gospel to reach this land after its composition. It seems that John did know of the synoptics allowing for number 2 above , and yet wrote from other sources, and with a different purpose allowing for number 1 above [cf.
Handing Off the Baton 2 Timothy 4: Walking the Romans Road.
You are here Home. But there is evidence which can lead to the conclusion that is was the Apostle John B. Early church tradition is unanimous in ascribing the fourth gospel to John 1. John was either cited or named as authentic during the first four centuries by the following 2 a. Clement of Rome c. Clement of Alexandria c.
The Muratorian Fragment c. The Latin Marcionite Prologue c. Log In Sign Up. Authorship, Dating and Provenance of John's Gospel. All sources of ideas and quotations are duly acknowledged in references. Yet if it was the work of a second-century believer who had never met Jesus, from a location incongruent with the patristic testimony, then perhaps our wider theological conclusions cannot be stated as boldly, nor our orthopraxy expressed with the same degree of conviction.